July 2004

The Cat Who Ate The Canary
Submitted Saturday, July 31, 2004 - 12:53:11 PM by Klaitu

This one is very interesting. It's the story of how Berman sidled himself into heading up Star Trek:

David Gerrold, who wrote the classic Star Trek episode "The Trouble With Tribbles" and the legendary guidebook The World of Star Trek, as well as episodes of Babylon 5, Sliders and other shows, plus a long-running column in a popular science fiction magazine, spoke extensively about his career and his frustrations with Star Trek: The Next Generation in a recent interview.

Gerrold alleged in his talk with TV Shows On DVD that Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry's mental health was failing near the end of his life, though he added that Paramount would not acknowledge it. The writer of "The Cloud Minders" and a sometime script doctor on the original series, he was originally hired as a producer on the fledgling Next Generation, "but they kept whittling my duties. And my title. And my pay."

Though a favourite with fans because of his episodes of the previous shows, "finally got the very clear message that Gene's lawyer didn't like me. And that whatever Gene promised me, the lawyer was going to take away." He believed that the lawyer, Leonard Maizlish, was afraid that Roddenberry could lose creative control of the show, "so what he was doing was significantly undermining everybody that might be a threat to Gene, so that he could stay in control."

Though Gerrold characterised Roddenberry as a heavy drinker who "could sit down with a bottle of Scotch and a ream of paper...and eight hours later he'd get up and he'd have a finished script and a half-empty bottle of scotch", he compared the show's creator to Ernest Hemingway and said that compared to Roddenberry, Rick Berman was brought in by the studio to manage the details. Gerrold said the studio had blamed Roddenberry for the failure of Star Trek: The Motion Picture, and "Gene didn't like Rick, at all. But Rick was installed on the show by the studio as a way to keep a control on the show...to keep the budgets in line, make sure that the scripts were done." Ultimately, said Gerrold, Berman ended up in control rather than Maizlish because Berman played the politics of the studio more effectively.

Officially a consultant in the Next Generation credits, Gerrold left and claimed that the studio lawyer harrassed him, claiming that he was mentally ill. Putting Star Trek behnd him, Gerrold said that he told himself, "'I am going to write the ten best books that I can, in the next ten years, and then ten years from now I'll look and see where am I.'" Fifteen years later, "I've got a Hugo and a Nebula and a Locus Readership Poll...I've got a lot of books in print. So there's all this stuff that wouldn't have been written if I had stayed with Star Trek." He also wrote scripts for other TV shows, including a remake of Land of the Lost.

Though Gerrold stated that Paramount denied working on a remake of "The Trouble With Tribbles" until TV Guide confirmed the news to him, he said that Berman ultimately invited him to appear as a crewmember in "Trials and Tribbleations", petting one of his furry creations. "I said, 'Look, Rick: there's enormous publicity here. I can be useful to you.' He got it. But apparently they thought I was at war with Star Trek over there. I'm not. I don't care. Give me a break; life is too short."

Gerrold said he had heard that Columbia House had the rights to the animated Star Trek and that no interviews had been conducted yet for a DVD release, but he expected it to be out by early next year. Asked what he thought should be done with Star Trek today, Gerrold said, "Star Trek, at its best, is when it remembers that it is about taking on the big challenge of considering the question, 'What does it mean to be a human being?'" He emphasised the need for episodes that tackled issues like ecology and the environment, like his own War Against the Chtorr.

In the first part of the interview, Gerrold discussed bringing Star Trek writers to Land of the Lost; in the second part, he discusses his film The Martian Child, in production by New Line Cinema. The excerpts above are from part three at TV Shows on DVD.



Still Alive
Submitted Saturday, July 31, 2004 - 12:36:15 AM by Klaitu

Hey folks, I'm still around, just been a little busy. That's why the updates are so slow. It is summer, after all!



Stories of Humor
Submitted Friday, July 23, 2004 - 1:35:10 PM by Klaitu

Actually, it's a news nuggets, but don't tell anyone!

Pizzaman vs Democrats:

Even though he voted for George W. Bush four years ago, Mark F. Pasquale was looking forward to the Democrats coming to town, especially since the pizza shop he has run for the past 23 years is right across the street from the FleetCenter. But then the barriers started going up, the security rules kept getting changed, and he finally had enough. He's closing during the convention and leaving behind a banner in support of Bush.

''It seems like there was supposed to be a party, but it turned out to be a private party," said the 51-year-old Pasquale, who was deluged with media attention yesterday as the 24-foot-long, 4-foot-high banner draped across the building started getting noticed. ''They have 30,000 prepared meals . . . I put my food against anybody, but you can't compete against a free meal."


Corvette Coma:
The Boston Globe reported Thursday as his son was comatose at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Stackiewicz told him: "Jason, if you wake up and you live, I'll buy you a Corvette.

"I was committed, and then when he woke, I told him what I'd promised him."
http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20040722-025855-8674r.htm




Trek Newsblast
Submitted Friday, July 23, 2004 - 1:17:39 PM by Klaitu

Alright, here's a bunch of assorted trek information for those of you counting:

The new season will not be a large story arc like last season, but will be a set of smaller arcs that fit together. The Xindi arc will be concluded at the first of season 4.

Berman is in talks with Shatner to come on Enterprise. Shatner would be playing an "incarnation of Kirk" and not neccessarily Kirk's relatives.

Brent Spiner is coming up in the first part of season 4 playing the great-grandfater of Data's creator. Apparently he's into genetic engineering and is sort of like Frankenstein.

Jolene Blalock said that T'pol might just get married in this season. No word on to whom.

The Temporal Cold War arc that has been around since the first episode is set to conclude sometime this season. They say that it's possible we won't learn who "Future Guy" is.

Apparently Vulcan is in for a Civil War.. a war between oldschool Vulcans and the 23rd century Spock-like vulcans. I hope they realize we know who wins.

In other news, they want Frakes to direct the next Trek movie, which is also supposed to be a prequel (why.. we just don't know).

Jerry Goldsmith, the composer of 80% of all Star Trek music died recently at age 75.



Stargate Ratings
Submitted Saturday, July 17, 2004 - 1:40:55 PM by Klaitu

For shame, Enterprise, for shame!

The season premiere of Stargate SG-1 left all previous ratings records in the dust on Friday, scoring a 2.4 household rating. More than 3.2 million viewers tuned in for the 2-hour "New Order", making it the most-watched original episode in the show's history.
Not only is it a new ratings record for Stargate, but the 2.4 also makes "New Order" the first episode of any original series on SCI FI ever to garner more than 3 million viewers. It was also the most watched program of any kind for SCI FI so far in 2004, the network reported.

The SCI FI Channel finished in first place among cable networks for the night among viewers age 25 to 54, and second in the 18 to 49-year-old demographic. "New Order" was the also second highest-rated program of the entire day in those groups, and number four overall.

Stargate's previous record on SCI FI was a 2.2 rating, earned by "Evolution, Part 2" in when the second half of Season Seven premiered in January.
These are the ratings that Enterprise used to get in its first season, which put it in last place among the 5 networks. For a cable series.. that's pretty impressive!



Stargate Atlantis
Submitted Saturday, July 17, 2004 - 1:36:21 PM by Klaitu

I was skeptical of Stargate Atlantis. It's hard to know what to think of spinoff series.. some of them are really good, but most of them just totally suck. On top of that, they've got a female lead, which I have been scared of ever since Janeway taught us all how to cluck like a chicken.

SO, here's the skinny.. Daniel Jackson finds the location of the lost city of Atlantis is an 8 symbol address. Dr. Weir, who is the big cheese of Ancients research is all revved up about this, so she gets O'neill to let them go through the Stargate to Atlantis.

This, of course, means that they have to use the Ancient battery from the ancient's outpost in Antarctica to get enough juice to the stargate to go to an 8 symbol address.

So they go on through to Atlantis. It's a spaceship city that is at the bottom of an ocean. There was an alien race in this galaxy that beat the crap out of the Ancients, and so they sunk the city and "made it lost" so that it wouldn't be destroyed.

It's been there for a mobillion years, so it's just about to run out of power and drown everyone.. and of course, it dosen't have enough power to let them return to earth.. so they go in search of more power in the Pegasus galaxy.

Well, to make a long story short.. some of their guys are kidnapped by the new badguy race.. the wraith. The Wraith are like vampires, except they suck your youth instead of blood. The Atlantis guys kinda.. accidentally awaken their entire race.

They never do find any power.. thankfully the city is smart and floats itself so that nobody is drowned.. and that's pretty much where it ends.

Acting is pretty good, casting is excellent, and the characters are likable. Dr. Weir is alright so far.. she hasn't clucked yet, but I am still scared that she will start.

Definately worth a look-see, especially if you're into Stargate.



White Water Bay
Submitted Saturday, July 17, 2004 - 1:21:55 PM by Klaitu

To those of you who don't live in Oklahoma, the words "White Water Bay" don't mean very much.. so let me 'splain. White Water Bay is a water park here in Oklahoma City, and it's owned by the same people who own Six Flags.

As a teen, I used to go to White Water allll the time. At least 3 times a week, my aunt and uncle had a season pass and drug us along with them. It was a lot of fun.

White Water has the standard gambit of waterpark rides, mainly consisting of large water slides. You spend an hour waiting in line going up, and about 30 seconds coming back down.

They also have a wavepool, which is basically a giant swimming pool with wave generators that makes huge swells. Then there's the "Castaway Creek" which is a swimming pool shaped like a creek.. and it has a current in it so that it drags you around.

Perhaps my favorite ride is the Secret Falls.. You get on a tube and float around in a pool, and then you fall off a waterfall into another pool with a waterfall.. and so on.

When I went as a kid, White Water was owned by someone else, and there were a lot less lifeguards. The Secret Falls for instance used to have 2 lifeguards.. now it has 7.

As an adult going, my experience was somewhat different from those golden days of yon. First off, it's $22 bucks per ticket. Yeah, 22 dollars.. for a waterpark. So, since me and Bran were going, that's $44. Next thing you need is a locker to put your shoes, keys, and suntan lotion in.. that'll be 7 bucks please. 7 bucks! For a Key that youre going to RETURN! Then, if you want a tube (which you have to have for all but 2 of the rides) that's another 7 bucks. So far we're up to $57.

So, you're hungry.. want some food? Well, no you don't. A single, lone, solitary corn dog is 6 bucks! Want a Coke? You could get a 16 ounce coke for $3! I expected the prices to be inflated.. but I didn't expect them to be insane. This is like Disneyland prices. The funny part was that I didn't see any of the vendors take any customers at all, except the soft drink guy.

Six Flags.. be smart.. put in a McDonalds or something and let them blow everyone away, and then charge McDonald's insane prices for rent. You'd make a lot more money.

Anyways, I had a pretty good time hangin wit my sweety.. we did some slides, hit the waves, rode the river, went ovet the waterfalls.. and we used sunscreen so that we didn't turn into lobsters! Bran gots one burned ear and one not-burned ear because she forgot to slather both ears!

I had fun, but not like $57 bucks worth of fun. I had more like.. $20 bucks worth of fun. The main detractor from all the fun was all the freakin people. There were approximately 5 billion people there.. all splashing and screaming. you couldn't really "swim" anywhere because you'd bump into someone every 3 or 4 feet. Basically, what you end up doing is "communal floating".

So, White Water Bay.. once every 10 years seems just about right, what with those prices and all the people.



Syberia 2
Submitted Wednesday, July 14, 2004 - 6:00:27 PM by Klaitu

I'm from the oldschool of gaming, and my very first game ever was the original King's Quest. So, I'm a fan of adventure games, particularly those from Sierra, who pretty much had the market cornered.

Then Sierra was bought by Cendant, and then Vivendi bought Cendant, so now Sierra is Vivendi Games, and they haven't made a good game since.. 1996 or so.

Enter some freaky newcomer from out of nowhere.. Microids. Sounds European to me.. but whoever these guys are, they sure know how to cook up an adventure game.

Now, you might notice the "2" on this game.. this is indeed the sequel to Syberia 1, which I never played but heard good things about. From what I understand, Syberia 1 had a conclusion like Kill Bill 1 had.. that is to say, it didn't have one.

Now Syberia 2 comes along and finishes the story... not that I'd know, I haven't beaten it yet.

So, here's what I know.. There's this eccentric toymaker who's just a little loopy. He wants to go to an island in Siberia called "Syberia" where there's blue grass and wooly mammoth still exist. For some unspecified reason, the main character, Kate, decides to go along with him on thie journey.

See, Kate is a lawyer and she needs him to sign a paper because his toy company is going to be bought out. Apparently she's forgotten about that..

Gameplay is standard fare for adventure games, but extremely simple. Point, click.. thats all there is to it. There are a variety of puzzles and lots of backtracking, but unlike the Sierra games of old, I haven't figured out a way to die yet.

The graphics in this game are crazy realistic, in fact.. it has the best graphics I have seen in a long long while.

If this game has problems, it will be in the replayability department. The story is linear, and the whole thing is more like an interactive movie than a game.. but it has puzzles. Lots and lots of puzzles.. so if you like movies, and you like puzzles, this is the game for you. Of course, since the carrot on the end of the stick here is the story resolution, there really is no reason to play through again.

A big thumbs up for bringing back the adventure game, and another big thumbs up for doing it right.. with insanely cool graphics.

Thumbs down for having no plot branches, plot twists, or any real dangers.

Overall Score: 8 of 10



Battlefield Vietnam
Submitted Saturday, July 10, 2004 - 3:02:26 PM by Klaitu

The Vietnam War is probably the second-least interesting periods of history to my eyes.. the first being the Civil War. Suffice to say, I wou'd never have bought the game, but Carson gave it to me, so I figured I'd try it out.

I was pleasantly suprised. The whole design of the game transports you into the 60's, right down to the annoying radio DJ playing 60's hits.

Like its predecessor, Battlefield 1942.. it's not just a first person shooter, you also get to operate vehicles and artillery. Jeeps, Helicopters, Planes, APV's, Tanks.. they're all here.

Unfortunately, BF Vietnam has fallen into the age-old slogan of "balance"! That is, things that should be more powerful are not. You can fire a rocket launcher at a Jeep.. and not only does the Jeep not explode, nobody inside it dies. Using a machine gun will kill everyone inside the jeep, and leave it for your taking. Where is the logic here?

Oh yeah, and dropping napalm is cool.

If you're a fan of 1942, Vietnam is a natural extension. Halo players could get into it as well.

6 of 10.



Interview with the Vampire
Submitted Saturday, July 10, 2004 - 2:50:01 PM by Klaitu

Ack, a vampire movie! Oh, but hey, wait.. Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, Antonio Banderas, Christian Slater, and Kirsten Dunst? Okay, maybe I'll forgo the "all vampire movies suck" creed and take a gander.

Alright, if there is one thing that all vampires in all incarnations do, it's what? All together now: SUCK BLOOD. All vampires suck blood, that's the entire point to vampires. Keep this in mind, because we'll be coming back to this later.

Brad Pitt is a vampire.. and he became a vampire in the 1790's. Tom Cruise turned him into a vampire, but was frustrated with Pitt because he clung to human morality, so Cruise turns this little girl into a vampire, and because vampires are undead, she has to stay young like that forever.

Pitt and company spend their days eating people and basically doing nothing else. After awhile, they get pissed off at Tom Cruise and kill him.. twice. Then they decide to go to France in search of other vampires. The other vampires turn out to be not very friendly.. they kill the little girl, and so Pitt gets revenge on them by setting them on fire and chopping them in half.

Then he goes back to the United States and finds out that he didn't actually kill Tom Cruise (either the first or second time) and decides to move to San Francisco with all the other freaks.

He's about to eat Christian Slater when Pitt decides to tell him his life story, which Slater records onto audio tape. Slater gets scared and runs away, but Tom Cruise jumps in Pitts car and sucks his blood. The end.

The vast majority of this movie is spent obsessing over what we already know vampires do.. SUCK BLOOD. Here's a scene from the movie:

Brad Pitt: I wont take her life! It's wrong!
Tom Cruise: You loser, you're a vampire, kill em and suck all their blood!
Brad Pitt: No, I am clinging to human morality!
Tom Cruise: ARRRGH! You Suck!
Now, you get the point after the first time this scene plays out. The second time this exact same scene happens, you really get the point. The third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth time this happens is just redundant and boring.

WE GET THE POINT ALREADY! He dosen't want to kill people!

Not that I blame the filmmakers.. apparently all vampires do is sleep in coffins and eat people. All in all they are very boring, I suppose. It's a shame that vampires don't have more depth than that.

The only aspect to the story that is interesting in any respect is Kirsten Dunst. Her mind grows up, but her body never does. She looks on women with envy because they are what she can never be. Not that any of this matters, because she dies.

Perhaps the most disappointing is that the story has no completion. No story points are resolved. The final scene is Tom Cruise biting Christian Slater. You don't know what happened to Brad Pitt, nor do you know what happens to Christian Slater.

There are also several consistancy mistakes throughout the movie. For instance.. what happens when vampires are exposed to sunlight? They DIE! More accurately.. they turn into ash.. and apparently so do their clothes and jewelry.

What else can vampires do? They can fly, right? So if you trapped vampires in a big hole that the sun would eventually shine into, you'd expect they could fly out, right? Well, they don't.

The second time they kill Tom Cruise, they burn him alive. This dosen't kill him, it just really makes him mad. Later in the movie, Brad Pitt burns like 20 vampires alive.. which presumably will not kill them, but make them really mad as well.. so if the intent was to kill them, he did not succeed.

Aside from all this, there is a more disturbing and disgusting nature to the movie. The sheer number of bloodsucking scenes and the way that they are filmed indicates some form of sexual connotation. On many occasions, Tom Cruise will bite a chick, who then is suddenly overcome with pleasure. This gives the vampires this creepy sexual predator theme. It's like every time they bite someone it's the vampire equivalent to raping them.

In other words, its not my bag.. at all.

There are some very good points about this movie, however.

First off, from the allstar cast you know the acting is excellent and totally believable. Kirsten Dunst in particular does an amazing job.

Secondly, the costumes, wardrobe, and sets are appropriate to their eras and look amazing. They really lend themselves to the age of the setting.

Thirdly, there are no naked rave orgys.. like in all other vampire movies. Usually vampires have orgys, dance to trace music, smoke, do drugs, and suck blood. In this movie they just suck blood and sleep.

Overall Score: 2 out of 10

The only reason it didn't get a 1 was due to the acting, costumes, and no orgy scenes.



Department of Homeland Security Gets a Clue
Submitted Thursday, July 8, 2004 - 3:09:04 PM by Branwen

The Department of Homeland Security, which includes the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (comprised of U.S. Customs, the Department of Agriculture and the Border Patrol) has taken their immigration enforcement to a new level. Yes, they have commissioned unmanned patrol drones. It is big news to people who work in and around the government because, wow -- this seems suspiciously like a practical expenditure.



http://www.customs.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/press_releases/06252004.xml



Unlikely Larry King Guests
Submitted Friday, July 2, 2004 - 5:13:53 PM by Klaitu

A couple quick ones:














Big Day
Submitted Friday, July 2, 2004 - 11:54:43 AM by Klaitu

Bran sent me an interesting e-mail today. What's so great about July 2? well, check this out!

On This Day: Friday July 2, 2004
This is the 184th day of the year, with 182 days remaining in 2004.

Holidays
Feast day of Saints Processus and Martinian, St Monegundis, and St Otto of Bamberg.

Events
1776 - The Continental Congress passed a resolution saying that "these United Colonies are, and of right, ought to be, Free and Independent States."

1777 - Vermont became the first American colony to abolish slavery.

1788 - The Constitution went into effect after nine states ratified it.

1839 - Africans on the Cuban schooner Amistad rose up against their captors, killing two crewmembers and seizing control of the ship, which had been transporting them to a life of slavery on a sugar plantation at Puerto Priacutencipe, Cuba.

1850 - The gas mask was patented by B.J. Lane of Cambridge, MA.

1857 - New York Cityrsquos first elevated railroad opened for business.

1881 - Only four months into his administration, President James A. Garfield was shot at the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Depot in Washington, DC; he died in September from his mortal wounds.

1890 - Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act.

1900 - Count Ferdinand Graf von Zeppelin successfully demonstrated the world's first rigid airship.

1900 - The second modern Olympic Games opened in Paris.

1926 - The United States Army Air Corps was created.

1937 - Aviator Amelia Earhart and navigator Fred Noonan disappeared over the Pacific Ocean while attempting to make the first round-the-world flight at the equator.

1947 - A UFO crashed near Roswell, New Mexico.

1955 - "The Lawrence Welk Show" premiered on television.

1964 - US President Lyndon B. Johnson signed into law the Civil Rights Act of 1964, sweeping legislation prohibiting racial discrimination in employment and education, and outlawing racial segregation in public facilities.

1976 - The Supreme Court ruled the death penalty was not inherently cruel or unusual.

Births
1855 - Clarence Barron, American financial editor and publisher.

1877 - Hermann Hesse, German poet and novelist.

1905 - Jean Rene Lacoste, founder of Lacoste tennis clothing.

1908 - Thurgood Marshall, first black US Supreme Court Justice.



Big Fish
Submitted Friday, July 2, 2004 - 11:48:51 AM by Klaitu

Did you ever wonder what would happen if Tim Burton made another movie? Well, here you go.

Big Fish tells the story of a dying man and his son. The father is a storyteller who loves to tell tall tales. The son is a journalist who wants facts. The father dosen't tell the son facts, and the son dosen't tell the father stories. The don't get along very well, until the father is on his deathbed. The son finally then tells a story to his father, and the father dies. The End.

Most of the story is spent reliving the father's life from the father's perspective, which means "heavily exaggerated". His life is not particularly interesting, nor are the stories he tells. They're ridiculously outlandish in some parts, and then in others they are strangely human. The result is this sort of schism between what's real and what's not. Sadly, I didn't really care which was which.

In the end, the lesson to the movie is that reality is subjective, and that people are immortalized through the stories they tell.. be they true or false.

I myself found it difficult to identify with any of the characters. I also found it hard to find a theme throughout the movie, or at least some shred of substance to identify with. The jumps between reality and fantasyland were all too common. I was more interested in the "real" part of the story (the father dying) than I was with the "fantasy" part of the story.

Bottom line: this is Tim Burton's standard fare, it's a movie with a goth feel, mediocre cinematography, and an uninvolved, outlandish, and unengaging plot. If you're into Tim Burton and his propensity to unneccessarily insert circus freaks into anything, then you'll love this film.

You know, some people might call this an "art film".. and while I guess it counts, it's a really bad art film. I like fancy artsy stuff too, but just once I would like to see it put to proper use on an engaging story with interesting characters. They need to come up with something better than "I'm moody because I can't tell the difference between realities and the lies I've been telling myself for 50 years".

If you're like me and don't care at all for Tim Burton, check out Secondhand Lions which is almost the same theme, but done correctly and not lame.

Overall Score: 2 of 10.



Spiderman 2
Submitted Friday, July 2, 2004 - 2:13:24 AM by Klaitu

I saw the original Spiderman, not the first day it came out, but some days later. The first Spiderman had many fine points, but had a few hiccups.. mainly related to the villian.. the Green Goblin.

Spiderman 2 irons out the wrinkles of the first film.. the result is a far more enjoyable experience, at least in my opinion. The first truly great thing about this film is the credits sequence. The opening credits tell the story of the first film in comic book form.. where the panels of the comic book are actually scenes from the first movie altered to look like they were painted. This is by far the most amazing credits sequence I have ever seen in any film, ever.

The sense that this is just another part to the same story is very prevalent in this film. All the same actors are back, and sets from the first film are perfectly recreated in this sequel. Some shots are even retained, such as the "Parker takes out the trash" scene from the first film.

The plot in this film is much, much more character driven. There are action sequences, but the movie is not burdened or slowed down by these scenes. The movie is more about Peter Parker's internal struggle with his life. The prescence of Doc Ock is merely incedental to the story, Spidey dosen't spend the whole film trying to track him down or anything.

Also here is the continuation of plot threads from the first film, most notably regarding Mary Jane and Parker, and also the Green Goblin's son, who believes Spiderman killed his dad.

If this movie has a flaw, it's the formulaic nature of the sequel.

First, the theme music is identical to the first movie.. and while this is fine for opening credits and the like, this main theme is used at least 4 times in the movie, and it cuts in and out as if they just mixed it into the soundtrack from a CD they had lying around from the first film. There is new score, however.. and it blends seamlessly with the old score.

Secondly, the superhero/supervillian story follows much the same path as the first film. As you recall from the first film, the villian is a man possessed by his own ambition, and takes serious risks to see his vision fulfilled. Expect more of the same vis-a-vis Doc Ock. Another commonality is that in their "secret identities" Peter Parker and the villian are friends.. not to mention a final battle in an abandoned warehouse near the river.

There is also the aspect to the film that they are riding the thin line between Comic Book silliness, and actual Spiderman coolness. In the first film, Oscorp was designing the Green Goblin gear for a military application. It's hard to imagine exactly how an unstable glider and a neon green goblin suit would be of interest to the military. In the sequel, Doc Ock's tentacles also have a "practical" reason for existance.. but this purpose is a bit of a stretch, even moreso than Oscorp's military project.

So, overall this was a very enjoyable movie. I liked it a whole lot better than the first one, and the first one wasn't too bad either. Mad props for creating a character driven non-action storyline with action elements. It is exactly how it should be.

9 out of 10.

Oh, and also. Yes, the movie is set up for a third installment!