January 2010

Mass Effect 2
Submitted Friday, January 29, 2010 - 12:33:49 AM by Klaitu

We've all heard about Mass Effect 2. It's had a serious marketing push, and it's one of the blockbuster hitters of 2010. Everyone's been talking about it.. so is it as good as all the hype?

Mass Effect 2 is heavily plot driven, so I won't give away any spoilers.

Basically, Mass Effect 2 is a lot like Mass Effect 1, except better in every possible way. Combat is fast paced and more intense, the story kicks it up a notch, and your team is bigger than ever.

Those little technical problems that the first game had are completely gone here. No crappy elevators, no prefabricated levels, and more charater customization.

There are only two minor flaws in it's otherwise flawless execution:

- The music is AWFUL. It's even worse than the first game, and the first game sounded like a guy played the whole soundtrack on his casio keyboard. The Trailer has much better music than the game.

- The armor customization is pretty weak. They let you customize parts of your armor, but they only give you 2 or 3 choices.

But those flaws are more than made up for. In particular, I have to give props to the final level design. The final boss is challenging without being ridiculous, the level is creative without being impossible, and the story is truly suspenseful. They've made a big deal in marketing about how "everyone can die, including Shepard".. well, it's true, and even if you properly prepare the suspense is still there.

This is a game that you buy a console just to play.

Kudos, Bioware.

Overall Score: 9 of 10
Quality Rating: 5 of 5
Buy it!



Spartacus: Blood and Sand
Submitted Saturday, January 23, 2010 - 2:19:02 PM by Klaitu

If these things can be measured, this is perhaps the worst thing I have ever seen on TV. I know, that sounds extreme, but it is so bad that I would rather watch Jersey Shore.

What's Spartacus about? It's about nothing. It's about moody people cussing at each other on crappy looking CGI sets. It's about naked people humping each other, and it's about people exploding into voluminous amounts of the crappiest looking CGI blood you have ever seen life.

It's also about doing the crappiest "300" style slowdowns as many times as possible.

Here's the entire story of the first episode: Spartacus enters the coliseum and kills 4 people.

One sentence worth of story.. SIXTY MINUTES OF MEANDERING, USELESS AIRTIME.

Overall Score: 0 of 10



Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood
Submitted Monday, January 18, 2010 - 6:59:14 PM by Klaitu

Call of Juarez is essentially a first person shooter set in the old west.

As you readers know, I am not really a fan of the first person shooter, but on occasion I like to broaden my horizons with them, particularly if they don't involve me shooting aliens, nazi's, or terrorists.

Call of Juarez had me shooting Cowboys, Indians, and Mexicans.. and both Yankee and Confederate soldiers, too.

So far as First person shooters go, I liked this one a lot. It actually had a pretty solid story for an FPS, and the gameplay wasn't atrocious like most games of this sort.

If you've got some free time and are looking for an FPS, you could do worse..

Oh, and did I mention Gul Dukat from Deep Space 9 is one of the main characters?

Overall Score: 7 of 10
Quality Rating: 5 of 5
Rent it!



Star Trek Online
Submitted Friday, January 15, 2010 - 2:44:56 PM by Klaitu

I've been waiting for Star Trek Online for some time, it's been bounced around from developer to developer and landed at Cryptic, the creators of Champions online.

To me, this was pretty much the stench of doom for STO. Everyone who's in-the-know knows that Cryptic pretty much blows at making MMO's. The trailers seemed to confirm my suspicions.. but because Carson was so into it, and I am a die-hard Star Trek nerd.. I figured I'd give it a shot.

What the heck, it couldn't be worse than Star Trek: Encounters.

My experience playing was fettered with extraordinary amounts of crashing and lag, as I was playing the "open beta" of the game.. and so was everyone else. So, I am going to take this situation as not the norm.

What's the verdict?

In terms of Star Trekiness: STO is not as awful as the Star Trek books, but nowhere near as good as the shows/movies.

The plotlines here are pretty rudimentary, and probably could have been helped if they had hired a good Trek writer instead of voice actors like Quinto (who you hear for 6 seconds). Still, I can't really expect decent storyline from an MMO, even LOTRO struggled with that.

The art here is decent looking, but all sense of scale has gone out the window. Corridors are ENORMOUS, the transporter pads are absolutely HUGE. Obviously, in an MMO you need room to move the camera around, but I still think they could have gone a little smaller. The interiors feel nothing like Star Trek, in fact, they didn't steal anything from trek in terms of interior set design.. though everything does look "plausible".

Moving onto space, it's a lot of the same story. You start out with a Miranda class ship, but in STO, they don't class ships this way. In STO, you start with a "light cruiser" which looks like a miranda class. You are given parts to mess around with, so you can make this "light cruiser" into a Soyuz Class, or a Centaur Class, or a made-up BS cryptic class that looks like garbage. All of the ship classes are like this.. for Science vessel you get a Nova class, but you can dress it up and make it look like some BS cryptic classes, or mish-mash the parts as much as you want (or don't want).

Space also has problems with scale. A Nova Class science ship should be larger than a Miranda class, but in STO it isn't. The constitution class is likewise too small.. or maybe the Mirandas are too large. Also scaled wrong are planets, which are way too small in comparison to ships, however they do look nice.

I have to give a special mention to the planet exteriors. There are a wide variety of planetary enviornments you can beam down to. Some of them are earth-like, some of them are desert-y.. and some looks entirely like a set from 60's complete with rubber plants and foam-looking rocks. The planetary surfaces are pretty amazing, if a bit small.

In terms of gameplay:

Star Trek Online is essentially Guild Wars.. in space. Everything is instanced. There are even multiple instances in the same zone. You will be looking at the loading screen a lot.

The universe is carved up into sector blocks, which consist of several sectors of space. Sector Blocks are quite large, much larger than I anticipated a cryptic game to have. It might take 10 minutes to fly across an entire sector block.

Within each sector block are various systems and space stations that you can zone into.. maybe for a mission, maybe for a patrol. Some sector blocks are unexplored, which lets you chart strange new worlds and explore alien planetary surfaces.

Speaking of planetary surfaces, everywhere you go, you'll go with your Away Team who are also your bridge officers. you can customize your bridge officers in the same way as your own character, and level them up just the same too. Otherwise, the "ground" portion of the game is pretty much like a traditional MMO. Equip armor/weapons, kill things, make XP.

The space battles are real-time. you are actually piloting your ship (as opposed to something like Eve, where the computer does it all for you). The objective is to punch through the enemy's shields while protecting your own. Every ship has 4 shields.. front, back, right, left. Trying to maneuver to where you can keep firing on the same shield vs your opponent while trying to line up your big guns can be quite challenging. It's a lot like Starfleet Command 3 in that regard.

STO has the potential to be a lot of casual fun with some of your friends who happen to be Trek fans. It's not a persistant world, and it is not condusive to roleplay, nor does it have a good way to form community. It's some popcorn fun that is not particularly deep.

Overall Score: 8 of 10
Quality Rating: 4 of 5
Buy it!

The first month is pretty much guaranteed fun. After that, it's anyone's guess.



Obscure Relevance
Submitted Monday, January 11, 2010 - 1:54:02 PM by Klaitu

The most popular trek characters, according to a recent poll

Dolim 0 0%
Daniels 0 0%
Seska 0 0%
Wesley Crusher 0 0%
Silik 1 1.54%
Samantha Wildman 1 1.54%
Female Founder 1 1.54%
Lursa 1 1.54%
B'Etor 1 1.54%
Christine Chapel 2 3.08%
Vash 2 3.08%
Janice Rand 2 3.08%
Katherine Pulaski 2 3.08%
Gowron 2 3.08%
K'Ehleyr 2 3.08%
Kang 2 3.08%
Naomi Wildman 2 3.08%
Elizabeth Cutler 2 3.08%
The Borg Queen 2 3.08%
Zephram Cochrane 2 3.08%
Admiral Maxwell Forrest 3 4.62%
Travis Mayweather 3 4.62%
Neelix 3 4.62%
Tom Paris 3 4.62%
Kor 3 4.62%
Keiko O'Brien 3 4.62%
Kasidy Yates 3 4.62%
Michael Eddington 3 4.62%
Deanna Troi 4 6.15%
Tasha Yar 4 6.15%
Professor Moriarty 4 6.15%
Lore 4 6.15%
Hikaru Sulu 4 6.15%
Jake Sisko 4 6.15%
Rom 4 6.15%
Chakotay 4 6.15%
Icheb 4 6.15%
General Chang 4 6.15%
other 4 6.15%
Ro Laren 5 7.69%
Leeta 5 7.69%
Winn Adami 5 7.69%
Tora Ziyal 5 7.69%
Morn 5 7.69%
Harry Kim 5 7.69%
Jonathan Archer 5 7.69%
Christopher Pike 6 9.23%
Saavik 6 9.23%
Dr Beverly Crusher 6 9.23%
B'Elanna Torres 6 9.23%
Kes 6 9.23%
Degra 6 9.23%
Pavel Chekov 7 10.77%
T'Pol 7 10.77%
William T. Riker 7 10.77%
Kathryn Janeway 7 10.77%
Hoshi Sato 7 10.77%
Nyota Uhura 8 12.31%
Reginald Barclay 8 12.31%
Lwaxana Troi 8 12.31%
Ezri Dax 8 12.31%
Nog 8 12.31%
Martok 8 12.31%
Porthos 8 12.31%
Khan Noonien Singh 9 13.85%
Geordi La Forge 9 13.85%
Damar 9 13.85%
Guinan 9 13.85%
Malcolm Reed 9 13.85%
Sarek 11 16.92%
Tuvok 11 16.92%
Worf 12 18.46%
Odo 12 18.46%
Jadzia Dax 12 18.46%
Phlox 12 18.46%
Dukat 13 20.00%
Dr Julian Bashir 13 20.00%
Seven of Nine 14 21.54%
Quark 15 23.08%
Weyoun 16 24.62%
Shran 16 24.62%
Kira Nerys 16 24.62%
Q 17 26.15%
Montgomery "Scotty" Scott 19 29.23%
Benjamin Sisko 20 30.77%
Charles "Trip" Tucker III 21 32.31%
Miles O'Brien 22 33.85%
James T. Kirk 25 38.46%
EMH (The Doctor) 25 38.46%
Data 27 41.54%
Garak 29 44.62%
Dr Leonard "Bones" McCoy 31 47.69%
Jean-Luc Picard 31 47.69%
Spock 40 61.54%





New Year's in Branson
Submitted Wednesday, January 6, 2010 - 12:15:36 PM by Klaitu

It's not often that I take a trip anywhere particularly distant.. actually, it's been about 7 years since I went anywhere.

Trips these days ususally involve a lengthy car rids, and my body was just not built to handle those. After 4 hours or so in a car, I start to get all cramped up.. but I went ahead and decided to go to Branson this year, which is 6 hours away from me.

We left at 5:30 in the morning. Why so early? It's my grandparents, they wake up at 4 AM every day, and they get really bored if stuff doesn't start happening by 7 AM. The rest of the universe finds this "too early" and I am among them on that point.

However, since all I had to do was ride in a car, it worked out alright. I slept through about 5 hours of the 6 hour trip.. not that it saved by body from getting cramped up.

The first place we ate was at Lambert's Cafe on Ozark, MO.. apparently it's "The only home of Throwed Rolls". My grandparents absolutely love this restaurant.. and in fact, they do throw rolls at you.

Myself, I was underwhelmed at the restaurant. The hamburger I ordered was amazingly bland, but the major problem I had with the restaurant was that they don't take credit cards, because they "don't believe in credit cards". This is just idiocy.

It turns out that Ozark, MO is about 30 minutes from Branson, MO. Our next stop was "The Amish Country Store" which was very confusing. The Amish Country story featured an extensive butter selection, all of which was in an electrically refrigerated case.

There were many other odd things there as well, like a 10 pound tub of Good n' Plenty's candy. Did you know the amish made those? Yeah. Me either. Some of our party scored some "Amish butter" which was likely just normal butter in a different wrapper, but oh well.

The next stop after that was the Tanger Outlet Mall. Why a mall? Because the cabin we were staying at was not available until 4 PM, and it was barely noon. As it turns out, the main reason we left so early was so we could eat at the awful restaurant.

So anyway, At the Tanger Outlet Mall, I ended up hanging out with my mom and sister in Old Navy, a store that we have at home. Then, we checked out a Yankee Candle store, also a store we have at home.

After 4 hours of boredom, finally our cabin was ready and we set out to see it. It was about 10 minutes out of town in the middle of nowhere on the side of a hill. I immediately fell asleep and slept for about 5 hours. Then it turns out that I was actually sleeping in the bed my parents had picked out, so I moved to my cot in the basement and slept for another 7 hours.

The next day, we decided to go check out Branson Landing, which is sort of like an outdoor shopping mall. It was perhaps 20 degrees outside, so perhaps this was not the best time, but we went anyway. In the center of this mall, they had a computer programmed fire and water show, which we watched. Then we went to Coldwater Creek, where my mom tried on clothes for 4 hours. I should also mention that we have a Coldwater Creek store at home, too.

We ate lunch at a Fuddruckers (which we don't have at home) and the burger here was far superior to the previous one I had. Then we went back to our cabin, where I spent a few hours trying to hack the local network and give everyone internet access, and I succeeded, though the internet access was pretty crappy. I spend the rest of the evening suffering through awful TV that my young cousins insisted on watching.. like "Jersey Shore" a completely awful "reality" TV series.

That night, we discovered that while although our cabin was large, it was not well insulated. In fact, you could hear people on the other side of the house talking in perfect clarity, even though there were 3 walls between you and them. I used my newfound internet access and celebrated New Year's by watching an episode of Deep Space 9 via a VPN to my house. It was awesome.

The next day, nobody wanted to do anything. I don't know if people had stayed up too late, or what the problem was, but everyone wanted to sit around the house all day and do nothing.. I do that at home too much, so I decided that I would make my own trek to the city of Branson. As it turns out, there were about 50 maps of the place in various brochures in the cabin, and so armed with that, my mom and I set out for candle shopping.

Not that I'm so into candle shopping, but it just barely beats sitting around and being bored.

Anyway, we ended up at Yankee Candle again, and I bought some candles to give as gifts. I smelled so many candles that my nose started bleeding. On the way back, I picked up some Steak n Shake (which is not near us at home) and a can of cheese pringles.

The rest of the day was spent waiting around doing nothing, I watched more Deep Space 9 through the internet.

The next day was a similar story, but I was able to gather an adventuring party and set out on an exploration quest. We explored the Chicago Cutlery, a knife store. We also checked out a victorian store, and a "Five and Dime" store, where everything cost more than a dime.

That Five and Dime store had some unique stuff though, like a Phyllis Diller paper doll book. You just can't find those anywhere!

Then the whole group went to a fish restaurant, where I ordered a steak that was merely adequate, and that was pretty much the last day.

The day we were set to leave, it snowed during the night about 4 inches, and made it impossible to get our of our cabin because the road to it was a giant hill. We spend a few hours pushing cars up hills, ate at IHOP (which we have at home) and made our way home.

Overall, I had fun, but I felt that maybe I could have seen more stuff and done more things that I can't already do at home. The trip was 4 days long, and we wasted at least half of that just sitting around doing nothing. Branson has some museums and other attractions that I would have liked to check out, but didn't get the chance to.